” 巴埃纳进一步指出:“他在比赛中做出了许多不易察觉的贡献,这届赛事他的整体发挥堪称卓越。
1、kk体育 2010年,另一位巴萨球员在世界杯决赛的加时赛登场,永远改写了西班牙足球。
圆梦诺坎普:从遥不可及到梦想成真 对于年仅19岁的埃斯帕特而言,2026年堪称梦幻。kk体育在新店的空间设计上,Wagas跳出传统轻食空间的清冷感,通过红色瓦片、木质船型长椅等元素,搭配自然材质与明亮色调,营造出北欧小镇般温暖而包裹的氛围。
2、刚刚,全球三大AI包揽IMO满分!击败99%人类
当你已经像这样付出了一切,无论踢得好与坏,都很难再苛责什么。

3、周星驰,恰烂饭
特朗普将奖杯交到罗德里手中。
4、卡皇不如顿宝?巅峰赛季卡佩拉仍能占优 名宿:他赚了超1.5亿美元
最核心的问题是,从目前的阵容来看,米兰现在并不缺少边锋。
5、突发!让张益唐苦熬7年的雅可比猜想,Fable 5竟一夜推翻证伪
我们非常愿意和云厂商、模型厂商等合作,存储架构设计有各种可能性,有的客户SSD占比高,有些占比低,很多客户也会结合自身软件能力进行优化。
不过红黑军团并未打算放缓引援节奏,管理层还需要为阿莫林找到一名合适的10号位人选,目前他们正重点考察3名小孩哥。
此前,Momenta创始人兼CEO曹旭东曾表示,“汽车辅助驾驶竞争将在2026年结束,国内最终只会有三家参与者胜出。
6、PS4模拟器重大进展!博主完整通关两款PS4独占
这笔交易的迅速达成,不仅宣告了红魔中场重建的关键一步,也让维拉面临核心流失的无奈局面。
那是一段令人窒息的保级之旅。
7、倪萍万万没料到,评价邹市明的一句话,直接把她推上舆论风口浪尖
32场各项赛事不败的纪录,让这支非洲劲旅的稳定性令人敬畏。
另一方面,扩充生态。
8、曝浙江北控完成交易!昔日国字号前锋换队,CBA又有一支争冠球队
我们历史账上面,永远有花不完的钱。
斯洛文尼亚名哨斯拉夫科·温契奇将担任主裁判,领衔斯洛文尼亚裁判组执法,而约旦裁判阿德汉·马哈德迈将出任第四官员。
莫德里奇在中场10米区域的调度堪称艺术,佩里西奇边路内切传中,克拉马里奇禁区内抢点完成终结。
9、省钱预警!谁说好东西一定贵?铂耐/安吉尔/方太…现在下手太划算!
这是挪威时隔28年重返世界杯舞台,哈兰德正在书写属于自己的时代。
相反,这位中场球员已成为俱乐部在转会市场上最具价值的资产之一,沙特联赛球队正加紧行动,试图将其签下。
10、中卫沙坡头区2025年河北片区农村自来水改造工程等三个项目资产确权登记的公示
比赛太多了,身体太累了,但为了球队的荣誉,他只能咬牙硬撑。
产业链的各环节,似乎都在向更靠近用户入口的位置移动。
1、日本车企为何在中国走向大溃败?
镰田大地今年29岁,出道于日本J联赛的鸟栖砂岩,2017年就登陆欧洲,加盟了德甲的法兰克福。
2、足协杯:泰山6-5三镇!两度追平+点球大战翻盘 铜梁龙2-0十人西海岸
目前的金球奖概率榜上,梅西以17%的支持率稳居第二,仅次于凯恩。
3、全锦赛男双16强出炉:龙蟒组合开门红!国乒主力选手进展顺利
不管留在巴萨还是转投巴黎,不管未来如何,这一脚已经刻进了历史。六项违规叠加治理漏洞!太和农商行被罚300万,四名责任人连带追责而在改革为直营模式之后,耐克的线上全部库存、物流、营销投放、退货风险全部将由自身承担,一旦市场需求不及预期,库存直接积压在品牌端。
4、再也不乱扔「外卖袋」!果然,只要换个思路,就成了家居“好物”
1/16决赛3-0完胜奥地利,1/8决赛梅里诺绝杀葡萄牙,1/4决赛在先丢一球的情况下二比一逆转比利时,半决赛面对夺冠热门法国,西班牙用一场2-0的完胜证明了自己的含金量。
5、汪峰女友森林北带俩娃自驾独库公路!全程独自开车,网友:这后妈当得太飒了
摩洛哥的战术更加求稳,他们通常采用4-2-3-1站位,防守时边后卫回撤形成5-4-1。
6、94比57大胜37分!女篮霸主冲击五连冠稳了:王思雨缺席高颂12分6板
而这款模型的硬指标足以载入开源史: 2.8万亿总参数,896个专家中激活16个的超稀疏MoE架构,是全球首个开源的3万亿级别模型; 基于自研 KDA(Kimi Delta Attention)混合线性注意力机制与注意力残差(AttnRes)构建,相较上一代K2整体扩展效率提升约2.5倍; 100万token上下文窗口,原生支持视觉理解。
"利物浦中场、阿根廷国脚麦卡利斯特在世界杯半决赛前表示,眼下这支英格兰队的比赛节奏,和他在英超每周遇到的对手并不一样。
葡萄牙和西班牙是知根知底的老对手,自1921年首次交手以来,两队总共进行了41场正式比赛,西班牙18胜16平7负占据优势。
7、泰山依木兰还有很多缺点要改变提升,未来的泰山是缺边后卫新人的
因凡蒂诺的扩军蓝图在商业和政治上或许是一盘大棋,但对于中国足球而言,它无法成为掩盖自身问题的“安慰剂”。
为获取足以支撑风险判断的物理证据,研究团队在受控实验室中,使用良性代理序列进行了组装验证。
8、“光模块之王”赴港上市:募资545亿港元背后三个真相
此前一场访谈里,针对为何要储备充裕资本的提问,地平线机器人创始人余凯表示,“地平线花更多精力思考我们会死在什么地方。
北京时间7月4日上午,2026美加墨世界杯1/16决赛将迎来一场南美与非洲的对决,哥伦比亚将在堪萨斯城体育场迎战加纳。
利物浦已向巴塞罗那正式报价,求购西班牙前锋费兰·托雷斯。
这让 3D 打印的关键链路变短了:从“我想打印一个东西”,到“机器开始工作”,中间少了很多过去只有老玩家才能跨过去的台阶。
用户谢贤前女友coco称谢贤卖谢霆锋送的劳斯莱斯帮她填窟窿 为冲击NBA联赛!徐昕被曝暂别男篮集训队,郭士强惨遭重大打击!赠送2026届上海铁路局校招3027人,南铁成最大赢家,全国34所职院上榜她是女排顶级二传,冠军拿到手软,35岁才退役,如今身份不一般
+19973
用户男篮世青赛太惨了!最后1分钟领先5分被绝杀:中国队遭逆转吞恶果 为0-2客场不敌广州豹,宁波队首战输球不输志赠送中华环保世纪行2026年宣传活动启动人气票
用户华尔街见闻早餐FM-Radio 为重度荒漠化土地减少40%!美媒:中国用最朴素的方式驯服沙漠赠送建信财险董事长闪辞,陷高管“流水席”困局?点赞最棒
+38813
用户清华大学发布ProteinOPD:面向蛋白质设计高效多目标偏好对齐框架 为字少事大,重器无声,让世界颤了三颤赠送博敏电子董事谢小梅减持11万股,减持金额153.89万元人气票
用户趋境科技华东区域总部落地钱江世纪城,五年内建成万卡级高品质 AI Token 工厂 为施南生为徐克丁克一生遭背叛,他晚年再婚生子,她孤身病逝太悲凉赠送索赔570亿!别让普华永道跑了人气票
用户演员不能完全相信编剧和导演 要“拒绝大概 敏锐感知 精准执行” 段奕宏:做这样的演员 我不怕被AI代替_网易订阅 为今年南山半马,跟何杰“在一起”赠送太子陈志的教父梦:电诈卷走家人们几百亿,反手被美国“黑吃黑”人气票
这不是巧合,这是质保期与缺陷暴露期的精准错配。我要发布>>
首轮2-2被日本逼平;次轮5-1横扫瑞典;末轮3-1击败突尼斯,以不败战绩锁定小组第一。我要发布>>
Nexfin News — China’s lithium battery industry is undergoing a rite of passage, transitioning from wild expansion to disciplined competition. In the first half of the year, a rare divergence between surging corporate earnings and falling stock prices brought a permanent shift in the sector’s underlying dynamics into sharp focus. By mid-July, A-share lithium battery stocks pulled back despite dramatic midyear earnings forecasts. Tianqi Lithium projected net profit growth of up to 4,935% year-over-year, EVE Energy forecast a 95% to 110% increase, and both Sunwoda and REPT BATTERO turned profitable again. Across the supply chain—from upstream lithium salts to downstream battery makers—most companies reported substantial operational gains. Yet robust earnings failed to stop equity valuations from sliding. On July 8, Chengxin Lithium hit its daily downside limit, Yahua Group dropped over 15%, and Tinci Materials saw more than 30 billion yuan in market value evaporate within a week. Ganfeng Lithium has fallen roughly 38% from its peak, while market leader CATL is down about 20%. The immediate trigger for the selloff was the resumption of operations at CATL’s Jianxiawo lithium mine. On June 29, the mine secured its safety production permit, which was officially posted on the Credit China website on July 7. The site—the world’s largest single lepidolite mine—had been idle for over ten months. With an annual capacity of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate, it previously accounted for 8% to 10% of China’s total output. Its return brings over 45,000 tons of additional supply in the second half of the year, hitting elevated lithium prices head-on. Futures markets reacted instantly: on June 18, as restart speculation grew, the main lithium carbonate contract fell 6.58% in a single session, beginning a steady slide from its May high of 205,000 yuan per ton. This stark contrast between thriving industrial output and falling stock prices coincided on the surface with lithium carbonate pulling back rapidly from its May peak of 200,000 yuan per ton to 151,000 yuan. But a more critical question remains: is this the sign of a cyclical peak, or is the industry undergoing a profound revaluation? Answering that requires stepping back to examine the paradigm shift that unfolded across the lithium battery sector between 2025 and 2026. The essence of this shift is not the fluctuation of any single price signal, but a permanent realignment of the industry's competitive playbook—moving from "who expands the fastest" to "who possesses technology, steady profits, and global compliance capabilities." From 60,000 to 200,000 In late June 2025, battery-grade lithium carbonate dropped below 60,000 yuan per ton, touching a three-year low of 59,900 yuan. Lithium salt producers across the sector incurred heavy losses, forcing widespread shutdowns among small and medium-sized manufacturers. From Australian hard-rock mines and small African projects to domestic lepidolite producers, virtually all marginal capacity went offline that summer. A two-and-a-half-year price slump accomplished its single necessary function: clearing out excess supply. By the fourth quarter of 2025, supply and demand dynamics reversed faster than the market had anticipated. The initial spark came from energy storage demand. Data from research firms including InfoLink show that global energy storage cell shipments reached roughly 610 GWh in 2025, up over 90% year-over-year, with fourth-quarter volumes alone topping 200 GWh. Production schedules showed energy storage cells clearing lithium carbonate inventories at an accelerating quarter-over-quarter pace. As growth in electric vehicle batteries moderated, energy storage stepped in not just to absorb excess capacity, but as the industry's primary growth engine. Surging demand was only half the story; supply contracted just as sharply. Small African mines and high-cost domestic lepidolite operations exited the market. Meanwhile, Zimbabwe announced a temporary suspension of lithium concentrate exports in February—a country that accounted for 15.5% of China’s lithium concentrate imports in 2025. Although Australia remained the primary pillar of China's upstream raw material supply at over 50%, the policy further tightened market expectations surrounding upstream supply. Zimbabwe's Ministry of Mines later confirmed that a formal export ban would take effect in January 2027. The tension between supply and demand peaked with the onset of a structural global deficit. Morgan Stanley estimated in early 2026 that the global market would face a shortfall of roughly 100,000 metric tons of lithium carbonate equivalent (LCE) for the year. Soochow Securities calculated total annual lithium mine supply at approximately 2.14 million tons, representing 440,000 tons of new capacity—most of which was not slated to come online until after the third quarter. That timing gap fueled the price rally during the first half of the year. Driven by these converging forces and inventory restocking across midstream channels, lithium carbonate surged from 70,000 yuan per ton in October 2025 to 200,000 yuan by May 2026. Unlike the speculative frenzy that drove prices to 600,000 yuan in 2022, this recovery occurred after capacity had been fully built out, anchored firmly by real end-user demand. Gaogong Industry Research Institute (GGII) summarized the shift: "This is not a bubble, but a return to fundamental value. The structural surge in energy storage demand, combined with supply-side consolidation, has redefined a rational price band for lithium." Prices doubled quickly due to market sentiment and downstream stockpiling. July’s price correction reflected two main factors: the gradual release of new supply and downstream resistance to inflated raw material costs. Analysts generally expect lithium carbonate to trade within a median range of 120,000 to 160,000 yuan per ton for the full year—a price level that keeps most producers profitable without triggering another round of reckless expansion. Energy Storage as the New Engine In the first half of 2026, China's energy storage battery shipments reached roughly 485 GWh, a year-over-year increase of over 80%. Over the same period, power battery shipments totaled roughly 630 GWh, up over 30%. The gap between the two segments is narrowing rapidly. Structural figures are even more telling. In the first quarter of 2026, Chinese energy storage battery shipments totaled about 209 GWh, up 115% year-over-year and accounting for roughly 40% of total lithium battery shipments. By June, energy storage cells made up nearly 41% of monthly production schedules—up from around 30% a year earlier. According to InfoLink, full-year energy storage cell shipments in 2025 reached roughly 610 GWh, approaching 70% of power battery shipments over the same timeframe. Energy storage is no longer a side business for battery makers; it has emerged as an independent market reshaping demand across the industry. Behind this market realignment lies a fundamental shift in purchasing drivers. Before 2024, domestic energy storage growth was driven primarily by mandatory integration policies, which required wind and solar projects to install storage capacity. That regulatory setup created low-quality demand, leading to poor utilization, weak financial returns, and inconsistent cell quality. Between 2025 and 2026, market dynamics pivoted from regulatory compliance to commercial economics. The shift first materialized in the domestic market. In early 2026, the National Development and Reform Commission and the National Energy Administration jointly issued new capacity pricing regulations (NDRC Pricing [2026] No. 114), establishing a national capacity tariff mechanism for standalone energy storage facilities. Local standards were set between 165 and 330 yuan per kilowatt-year, depending on the province. Surveys by Soochow Securities indicated that internal rates of return (IRR) for storage stations in several provinces crossed the 6% threshold required for commercial viability, especially where peak-to-valley price spreads exceeded 0.3 yuan per kWh. IRRs for top-tier projects reached as high as 10%, fundamentally improving overall demand quality. This domestic turning point coincided with an explosion in international demand. Major solar-plus-storage projects launched across the Middle East, particularly in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, with individual project capacities regularly reaching several gigawatt-hours. In emerging markets across Australia, Southeast Asia, and Africa, weak power grids and rising renewable energy penetration transformed energy storage from an optional luxury into a necessity. Soochow Securities calculated that utility-scale storage installations in emerging markets grew 233% year-over-year in 2025, with an additional 69% increase projected for 2026. In Europe, energy security concerns and green energy quotas kept commercial, industrial, and residential demand robust. GGII projects that global energy storage battery shipments in 2026 will reach 800 to 1,100 GWh, representing year-over-year growth of 30% to 70%. Even at the mid-point estimate of 900 GWh, energy storage output is positioned to approach or match power battery production this year. As the industry's primary growth engine shifts, its core operational requirements are evolving as well. Power battery demand is dominated by automakers, whose priority is cost efficiency. The customer base for energy storage, however, is far more diverse: utility operators prioritize long cycle life and safety, data center owners require high discharge rates and extreme reliability, and overseas projects demand lifecycle compliance and supply-chain traceability. Winning in these markets requires technological adaptation, solid project execution, and international compliance capabilities rather than sheer scale. Oversupply or Industry Maturity? Evaluating battery utilization rates requires a closer look at the underlying numbers. In May 2026, the single-month installation rate for Chinese power batteries dropped to roughly 38%. Over the first five months of the year, cumulative power battery installations totaled 259 GWh against 863 GWh produced—yielding an overall utilization rate of about 30%. Factory output continues to outpace vehicle installations, leaving a substantial share of manufacturing lines underutilized. The five-year trajectory of Chinese power battery installation rates tells a clear story: 70% in 2021, 54% in 2022, roughly 52% in 2023, 50% in 2024, 44% in 2025, and 38% by May 2026. This steady decline in installation rates offers clear evidence of an industry transitioning from rapid early growth into maturity. Yet labeling the sector simply as oversupplied misses crucial nuances. The market is not experiencing a uniform glut; rather, it is undergoing sharp structural polarization. High-end shortages coexist alongside low-end surpluses. Demand for premium batteries with energy densities above 160 Wh/kg—primarily ternary chemistries—rebounded sharply, rising from a 6% market share in 2025 to 11%. Meanwhile, low-end products under 125 Wh/kg have effectively been phased out. Demand has also diverged sharply between commercial and passenger vehicles. Driven by subsidy policies, battery demand for electric heavy trucks and delivery vans surged, with battery consumption for electric cargo vans rising 169% year-over-year. By contrast, electric buses—once the industry's primary market—fell to fifth place. While market leadership remains dynamic, the nature of competitive moats is shifting. CATL and BYD together retain a 68% market share, but second-tier players like Gotion High-tech, EVE Energy, Svolt Energy, and Hithium are making gains. Competition is shifting from pure capacity expansion to technological differentiation and operating margins. From another perspective, declining installation rates are a natural hallmark of industry maturity. As annual growth moderates, a drop in capacity utilization from 70% to 40% is to be expected. While systemic capacity pressures continue to weigh on industry-wide profitability, and smaller players face ongoing price competition, market leaders retain the balance sheet strength to navigate the transition. As top-line growth slows, manufacturers lacking proprietary technology, accumulated capital, or global compliance infrastructure risk being squeezed out. This shift explains recent strategic course corrections by major capital allocators. Anode producer Sinomatech canceled a 10.3 billion yuan expansion, cathode supplier Dynanonic abandoned a 10 billion yuan project, and separator manufacturer Semcorp terminated a roughly 2 billion yuan facility in Malaysia. Top-tier players reining in massive investments is a classic sign of an industry transitioning from early expansion to financial discipline. This reallocation of capital does not mean expansion has halted entirely. In the first half of 2026, manufacturers announced over 65 new planned projects representing more than 1,500 GWh of capacity and over 220 billion yuan in total investment. Hunan Yuneng disclosed a 24 billion yuan expansion, while Yahua Group announced additional capacity in Zimbabwe. Expansion continues, but the prerequisites have changed: only enterprises with strong technical barriers, cash reserves, and global compliance infrastructure are positioned to invest while competitors scale back. Technology Race 2.0: Three Fronts If the period between 2022 and 2024 was defined by a race for manufacturing scale, 2025 and 2026 have marked a pivot toward technological differentiation across three distinct fronts. Front One: Structural Shortages in 314Ah Cells The central operational focus for the energy storage supply chain in 2026 has been a structural shortage of 314Ah cells rather than short-term price swings in raw lithium. By March, average spot prices for 314Ah cells from tier-one manufacturers approached 0.40 yuan per Wh, with small-lot orders reaching 0.45 yuan per Wh—a surge of over 25% within six months compared to the 0.30 to 0.34 yuan per Wh seen in August 2025. The immediate driver was rising raw lithium costs—at 180,000 yuan per ton of lithium carbonate, theoretical cell production costs sit between 0.35 and 0.38 yuan per Wh. However, the root cause was a supply gap during the industry's transition to larger formats. As manufacturers shift from 280Ah and 314Ah form factors toward 500Ah+ designs, investment in legacy 314Ah production lines has largely ceased. Because next-generation 500Ah+ cell capacity will not scale up until late 2026, production ramps and customer testing created a temporary bottleneck. During this supply gap, the deficit widened significantly, pushing delivery timelines for select orders into 2027. This dynamic reflects a clear shift in industry economics: market returns are no longer guaranteed simply by bringing capacity online, but by executing format transitions ahead of competitors. CATL has already deployed its 587Ah cell in a 2.4 GWh standalone storage project in Inner Mongolia, while EVE Energy has accelerated mass production of its 628Ah format. With the shift toward larger cell formats underway, manufacturing execution is everything. While 314Ah supply constraints present an immediate operational challenge, solid-state technology represents the long-term competitive battlefield. Front Two: A Return to Realism in Solid-State Batteries Although 2026 has been touted as the inaugural year for commercial solid-state battery deployment, that label requires qualification: current production consists almost entirely of semi-solid (hybrid liquid-solid) chemistries. Models including the NIO ET9, MG4, GAC Hyper, and Chery vehicles have entered the market equipped with semi-solid packs featuring energy densities between 350 and 400 Wh/kg. Because these designs remain compatible with over 90% of existing liquid battery production lines, retooling costs remain manageable and rollout schedules are accelerating. However, the commercial reality of all-solid-state technology remains far more complex than vehicle showroom specifications suggest. In March 2026, Ouyang Minggao, an academician at the Chinese Academy of Sciences, offered a candid assessment: "To be prudent, it is best not to commercialize all-solid-state battery vehicles over the next two years." He cited three major technical hurdles: solid-solid interface stability, where microscopic gaps between solid electrolytes and electrodes cause internal resistance to spike; lithium dendrite formation and safety risks; and the environmental volatility of sulfide electrolytes, which decompose upon exposure to moisture and demand strict manufacturing conditions. Industry leaders report steady if measured progress. CATL’s sulfide-based solid-state cell has surpassed an energy density of 500 Wh/kg, with small-scale production anticipated in 2027. BYD’s 20 GWh facility in Chongqing is scheduled to begin semi-solid production in the third quarter of 2026, targeting pilot runs for all-solid-state cells in 2027. Gotion High-tech plans to initiate operations on a 2 GWh solid-state line by late 2026, while EVE Energy has produced sample 60Ah solid-state cells. A clear timeline has taken shape: 2026 is focused on pilot line verification, 2027 on vehicle testing, and 2030 on potential large-scale commercialization. The implementation of recommended national standard GB/T 43568-2026 (Solid-State Batteries for Electric Vehicles) on July 1, 2026, established an initial regulatory framework for long-term development. Ultimately, 2026 marks less the mass adoption of solid-state technology than a recalibration of market expectations. Meanwhile, an underappreciated demand driver is quietly gathering momentum. Front Three: AIDC Storage as AI Infrastructure In the first five months of 2026, global energy storage shipments for AI data centers (AIDC) reached 10 GWh, surpassing total volume for all of 2025. Industry research firms project that global AIDC storage demand will reach 300 to 400 GWh by 2030—more than twenty times its 2025 level. Capital deployment in the segment is ramping up. CATL invested roughly 4.1 billion yuan to acquire a strategic stake in Senter Power to secure positioning in high-voltage DC power distribution for data centers, while winning a bid for a 2 GW / 4 GWh storage project at a computing center in Guizhou. Fluence signed agreements covering a 12 GW pipeline of potential projects with two major U.S. cloud providers, LG secured eight data center storage contracts totaling 6 GWh—including projects for Oracle—and Panasonic announced 350 billion yen in battery investment aimed at tripling its data center storage revenue. The expansion of AIDC storage is driven by a widening gap between AI computing power demands and utility grid capacity. Power consumption per rack in modern AI facilities has jumped from 5–8 kW in traditional data centers to 40–100 kW, while grid connection approvals and capacity upgrades often take three to five years. Onsite battery systems serve both as backup power and as a bridge to accelerate facility commissioning. Energy storage is moving from an auxiliary fallback to an integrated structural component of data centers. Following NVIDIA’s October 2025 announcement of an 800V DC power architecture—designed to phase out diesel generators and legacy uninterruptible power supplies (UPS)—storage systems are being wired directly into primary distribution networks. This shift expands the market beyond traditional buyers like power utilities and renewable energy developers to encompass cloud providers and infrastructure operators, establishing a distinct category of demand. Globalization 2.0 While domestic market consolidation marks the industry’s initial transition to maturity, international expansion presents a secondary test. Tariff structures, raw material access, and regulatory standards are tightening concurrently across major export markets. Trade barriers represent the most immediate hurdle. The European Union’s countervailing duties on Chinese battery electric vehicles have been in effect for five years and are expanding to include plug-in hybrids. In the United States, the Inflation Reduction Act continues to raise domestic content requirements for power and energy storage batteries. Concurrently, China has reduced its export tax rebates for batteries from 9% to 6% as of April 2026, with complete elimination scheduled for January 2027. Rising trade costs are accelerating a shift from direct product exports to localized overseas manufacturing. At the same time, competition over raw materials is intensifying. The U.S.-led Minerals Security Partnership continues work to build key mineral supply chains outside China, while changing rules in jurisdictions like Zimbabwe highlight shifting export policies. Strategic positioning across raw material supply chains remains an ongoing operational priority. Regulatory compliance presents a quieter but more complex technical hurdle. The European Union’s Battery Passport regulations will become mandatory on February 18, 2027, requiring detailed disclosure of lifecycle carbon footprints, material origins, and recycled content percentages. The impact of these rules depends heavily on how accounting frameworks are defined; systematic discrepancies in baseline emissions databases regarding Chinese energy mixes or manufacturing processes could affect market access. In response, leading Chinese manufacturers are moving from passive compliance to active engagement with international standards. CATL has partnered with BMW and Germany’s Catena-X network to help establish over 90 baseline carbon accounting metrics. BYD invested over 100 million yuan to develop its "i-Carbon Chain" platform for digital carbon tracking across its supply chain. Similarly, REPT BATTERO collaborated with TÜV Rheinland and Circulor on a battery passport initiative, securing third-party verification for 98 independent datasets from an EU Notified Body. Overseas manufacturing footprints are expanding in tandem: CATL’s production complex in Hungary, BYD’s plant in Brazil, Gotion High-tech’s joint venture in the United States, and Envision AESC’s gigafactory in Spain. Chinese battery makers are transitioning from a model of centralized domestic production for export toward localized manufacturing aligned with international standards. This next phase of international expansion hinges on regulatory transparency, supply chain control, and deep local integration. Beyond Maturity In July 2026, as equity valuations diverged from corporate earnings across the lithium sector, market participants wrestled with where the industry stands in its broader evolution. The most visible change is the shift in growth drivers. With energy storage shipments reaching 485 GWh in the first half of the year to account for over 40% of total output, the gap between storage and mobility applications is closing rapidly. This demand-side pivot coincides with capacity rebalancing on the supply side, where power battery installation rates have adjusted from 70% down to the 30%–40% range, signaling an end to early, unbridled expansion while overall margins remain under pressure. These structural shifts are redefining entry barriers across the market. With 314Ah cell prices rising over 25% in six months and AIDC storage demand expanding rapidly, technical capabilities are increasingly determining market positioning. As national standards for solid-state technology take effect and EU Battery Passport deadlines approach, regulatory compliance has become a baseline operational requirement. The trajectory of lithium carbonate—falling to 60,000 yuan, rebounding to 200,000, and settling near 150,000—reflects a market seeking equilibrium. This broader transition was highlighted by a joint policy announcement on July 18, when three Chinese government ministries introduced a new consumption tax structure for batteries. Effective September 1, lithium-ion batteries are subject to a 2% consumption tax, rising to 4% in September 2027, while sodium-ion and solid-state batteries remain exempt through the end of 2028. The policy ends a tax exemption for lithium batteries that spanned more than a decade. Phasing in taxation uses fiscal policy to encourage capacity optimization and technological upgrading by taxing established chemistries while incentivizing next-generation alternatives. For second-tier cell makers operating on narrow margins, the 2% tax burden—equivalent to roughly 0.007 to 0.008 yuan per Wh—will further compress operating margins, reinforcing market consolidation around capitalized leaders. For China's lithium battery industry, 2026 represents a clear inflection point. Enterprises equipped with proprietary technology, international compliance frameworks, and established brand equity face a broader global landscape as the sector matures. Conversely, manufacturers reliant on single customers, lacking technical moats, or unable to meet evolving compliance standards face mounting pressure. The early expansion phase of the lithium battery industry has drawn to a close. Its mature chapter is just beginning. (This article was first published on the TMTPost App. Author | AGI-Signal, Editor | Zhao Hongyu)梅西走下世界杯赛场,变身硅谷投资人。我要发布>>
当前,那不勒斯已经将他们的中场球员安古伊萨挂牌出售,如果能为其寻找到买家,就会再补进一名中场。我要发布>>
C罗六届世界杯仅有1个进球,还是点球;梅西已经独享世界杯“双王”,10助和21球分别领跑世界杯历史助攻榜和射手榜,梅西也是世界杯历史首位助攻和进球均上双的球员。我要发布>>
这里藏着极佳视界最大的叙事张力:自动驾驶世界模型的积累,真的能迁移到工业和家庭机器人身上吗? 从世界模型底层的物理规律理解、动态预测、时空建模能力看,确实是跨场景通用的。我要发布>>
面对如此糟糕的战绩,足协果断做出调整,由弗兰接过教鞭。我要发布>>
标哥做过几期揭露加盟商套路的视频,他最终得出的结论是:24年往后,量贩零食行业稳赚不赔的,不是零食生意,不是加盟商,只有品牌方。我要发布>>
本届世界杯决赛的当地时间恰好是7月19日。我要发布>>
一旦行业供过于求,价格战将不可避免。我要发布>>